The Houston Astros currently sit on top of the American League West with a 2.5 game lead over the Los Angeles Angels, a team paying Albert Pujols, C.J. Wilson, Jered Weaver, and the rest of the squad a combined $146.4 million. The Astros, meanwhile, will spend less than half that figure on players in 2015. Their total payroll comes in just north of $69 million, 29th out of 30 MLB teams and a remarkable $158 million less than the Los Angeles Dodgers are spending to field a team this year.The success of the Astros and the (comparatively) minuscule payrolls of other plucky small-budget teams is often cited by people trying to advance an egalitarian narrative: that the amount a team spends does not matter. In recent years, Time called the Royals the future of baseball. The New York Times went with Smaller Markets and Smarter Thinking. Baseball America wrote an article asserting, “if you look at competitive balance as the opportunity for teams to make the playoffs and legitimate runs at titles, baseball is truly in a golden era.” Sports Illustrated argued that the average payrolls of playoff teams show that money isn’t the factor it used to be and the Providence Journal offered, “money can’t buy success.” Andrew McCutchen, 2013 National League MVP, is the poster boy for what small-budget teams can accomplish, saying, “Payroll doesn’t mean everything. If that was the case, the Yankees would win every year.”That’s all heart-warming, but evidence suggests that the relationship between money and winning is as strong now as it’s been any time in the free-agency era. Check out the figure below, which shows the relationship between spending and win percentage during each of the three 10-year spans since 1985.1Salary and win percentage were standardized within each season to account for the league’s financial growth and changes in league competitiveness. Data collected from baseball-reference.com. Each team season is one dot in the figure, and the red line reflects a smoothed curve fit through the points. The smoothed curves represent the general relationship between spending and performance for each team season in each decade; aggregating all the decade’s data points shows a pattern: More money generally means more wins.The line gets steeper going from left to right, implying that in recent seasons, jumps in salary have been associated with larger gains in win percentage. Altogether, none of the 20 teams with the highest relative salaries since 1985 have finished below .500. GRAPHIC: Using data from the last 30 years, we created win-pay curves for every team in Major League Baseball. Click here to see how well your favorite team spent its money.J.C. Bradbury, an economics professor at Kennesaw State University, found that winning more increases revenue exponentially. “Going from 85 wins to 90 is worth more than 80 wins to 85,” he says. As a result, while it might cost more per win for a team that wins 90 games than 85, it makes financial sense because the revenue reward will be higher as well. This leads to a self-perpetuating cycle. Additionally, fans of teams that win frequently expect them to continue winning, and management pays more to do so. For a team like the New York Yankees, paying 10 percent more than anyone else for a second baseman who is only 5 percent better than his closest peer is worth the money (and they can afford it).But though the current narrative revolves around small-budget success stories as an argument against the importance of salaries, baseball has always had small-budget overachievers. “Just because you don’t spend money doesn’t mean you can’t win,” Bradbury says. As long as there has been baseball, there have been teams with low payrolls that have exceeded expectations in the win column.Perhaps one reason for the renewed focus on the success of small-budget teams is the importance of playoff success versus the regular season. Postseasons in American sports offer a smaller sample size than, say, soccer’s English Premier League, where the winner is determined by 38 games. In baseball, the better team (the one with the higher payroll) is less likely to prevail over the course of a short playoff series than they would be over an entire season. That, combined with the expansion of the playoffs, means it’s easier for a small-budget team to reach the World Series, as the Kansas City Royals did in 2014, losing to the San Francisco Giants in Game 7. Winning a playoff series can come down to a few factors — a couple of good pitchers and luck — that are less important during the regular season. “The formula seems to be: limp through regular season, get into playoffs, then win,” said Rodney Fort, professor of sport management in the School of Kinesiology at the University of Michigan.Fort, however, also thinks that the case for the relationship between payroll and wins is overstated. “When have we ever been satisfied that a simple relationship between one variable and another variable tells the whole story of the determination of winning?” he says. “What you really need to do is stop and think about what are all the other things: nothing about coaches, nothing about front office/GM acumen.” In Fort’s view, equating payroll and wins leaves out too many other variables.He has a point, as the relationship between salary and winning can be drastically different among different franchises. Some teams don’t get results when they spend more — the New York Mets frowny face is almost too perfect given their fortunes.For a few small-budget teams such as the Cleveland Indians and the Royals, though, there’s a strong relationship between spending and winning.As you can see in the chart of every team’s win-pay curves, spending usually helps, but incompetent spending gets a team nowhere. It’s a waste.Click here to see every team’s win-pay curves.
A 13-year-old in Illinois. A 47-year-old English woman. A 70-year-old Vegas oddsmaker. At first blush, there isn’t much linking them. But last year, all three were among the most successful March Madness prognosticators. That’s where the similarities end.With methods ranging from gut instinct to computational learning theory, these three characters demonstrate just how wide and varied the spectrum of strategies can be. But which strategy will you employ for your own bracket? Watch this video collaboration between FiveThirtyEight and Fictionless and decide for yourself.
Photo by The Associated Press.Robert Griffin III, who was fined by the Nike-sponsored NFL last season for wearing Adidas during a post-game press conference, was pinched for $10,000 by the league for wearing unauthorized apparel before Monday night’s preseason game against the Pittsburgh Steelers, a league official confirmed Thursday.A T-shirt bearing the words “Operation Patience” on it, worn before the game in which he did not play, did not conform with the NFL’s uniform rules – thus the fine, however petty.Griffin, coming off a torn ACL, practiced with and against the first team Wednesday–his first full practice since last season. Griffin took 49 snaps against the scout team defense last week.“I’m getting the team reps, and that’s what I wanted, and that’s what the team needed me to be out there doing,” said Griffin, who has yet to play in the preseason and remains in question for the team’s regular-season opener. “I feel good. I am confident coach (Mike Shanahan) easing me in has helped, and giving me the extra reps has helped now. My eyes are set on Philly.”After an examination before the Redskins played Pittsburgh, Griffin said Dr. James Andrews told him that his leg looked strong and his movement was good. Andrews’ message: Stay the course.
After Missouri’s Michael Sam revealed he is the first openly gay NFL prospect, NFL Nation and ESPN The Magazine combined to conduct an anonymous survey last week that indicated most players would have few objections to a gay teammate.Fifty-one players, almost an entire team roster, responded to four true-false questions. Although the survey showed that most players aren’t concerned with another’s sexual orientation, it also made clear the concerns that players would have with learning how to relate to an openly gay teammate.Forty-four players said a teammate’s sexual orientation didn’t matter to them, and 39 said they would be comfortable showering around a gay teammate. But 32 players said they had teammates or coaches who used homophobic slurs last season, and when asked whether an openly gay player would be comfortable in an NFL locker room, just 25 players said yes; 21 said no; while five declined to answer.One concern for players appeared to be learning how they could relate to a teammate they knew was gay, and whether they would need to behave any differently around him.According to one starting receiver, “Whoever takes [Sam in the draft] should have an open talk at the beginning of camp, where everybody can ask what he’s comfortable with, what offends him, what boundaries there should be. When it comes to race, people already know the boundaries, to a certain extent. But I don’t think football players are overly familiar with what can and can’t be said around a gay person.”Sam, who announced he is homosexual on Feb. 9, said his Missouri teammates rallied around him last season after he revealed his sexual orientation to them.“I’m telling you what: I wouldn’t have the strength to do this today if I didn’t know how much support they’d given me this past semester,” he said in the interview on ESPN.But one NFL starting tight end, who believes Sam will encounter some difficulties in the league, said: “There is a little more of a family environment in college. It was more like having brothers. In the NFL, you have friends, but it’s a more work-oriented environment. I hope guys can be professional and respect who he is and leave his personal life out of it.”Sam, who was co-SEC defensive player of the year last season, is expected to be drafted between the third and fifth rounds in May. He had 11.5 sacks and 19 tackles for loss in 2013, leading the SEC in both categories.
Serena Williams called comments by Russian Tennis Federation President Shamil Tarpischev “sexist and racist” when he referred to the No. 1 women’s player in the world and her older sister Venus as “brothers.”Williams was aghast when she learned Tarpischev, on a Russian talk show with former Olympic singles champion Elena Dementieva, interjected on a question about playing against the Williams sisters to say, “The Williams brothers … It’s scary when you really look at them.”The Women’s Tennis Association is seeking to have Tarpischev suspended for a year. He was fined $25,000.“I think the WTA did a great job of taking [the] initiative and taking immediate action to his comments,” Williams said. “I thought they were very insensitive and extremely sexist as well as racist at the same time. I thought they were in a way bullying.”Asked whether he regretted his comments, Tarpischev told The Associated Press on Saturday at the Kremlin Cup that the program on which he spoke was “a humorous show.” When asked about his ban, Tarpischev said: “I can’t comment. I don’t understand it.”In a statement released later by the Russian Tennis Federation, Tarpischev denied any “malicious intent” and said his quotes had been taken out of context.Tarpischev has been chairman of the Kremlin Cup, Russia’s only WTA event, for all of its 18 years as a women’s tour event, and is also a member of the International Olympic Committee. During the 1990s, he was the personal tennis coach to Russian president Boris Yeltsin and served as his adviser on sports matters.Russian tennis player Maria Sharapova, also in Singapore for the WTA Finals, said of Tarpischev’s comments: “I think they were very disrespectful and uncalled for, and I’m glad that many people have stood up, including the WTA. It was very inappropriate, especially in his position and all the responsibilities that he has not just in sport, but being part of the Olympic committee.”
For several years, NFL higher-ups have been a bit sour on the extra point. It slows down the game; kickers make them so often that they’re not really exciting, or even tense; and even if one is missed, it’s less “OMG, did you see that?” and more “WTF, kickers are terrible!”In preseason games, the NFL has experimented with narrowing the goal posts and/or moving back the spot of the kick on attempts. It is rumored to be considering eliminating the extra-point option entirely.That’s one way to encourage two-point conversions. But it’s not as exciting as the idea that the Indianapolis Colts are offering. This week, the Colts caused some buzz by making a crazy-sounding suggestion to the NFL’s competition committee: If a team converted its two-point attempt, it would get a shot at an additional point by attempting a 50-yard field goal.Considering that kickers now make 50-yard attempts about two-thirds of the time, this essentially means that successful two-point tries would be worth 2.66 points. That would clearly affect coaches’ strategy after a touchdown — or at least it should. Currently, a team needs to be able to convert a two-point attempt 50 percent of the time to make it a better option (barring tactical reasons) than an extra point. But in the Colts’ extra-extra-point scenario, a team would only have to convert its two-point attempt from scrimmage about 38 percent of the time.In 2014, teams made 48 percent of their attempts, which is just about in line with how they’ve done for the past decade. So under the proposed change, going for two would probably be right in most circumstances. (That’s a small sample size, though. It’s unclear exactly how good teams really are at converting two-point attempts because they are taken so rarely and teams don’t take them with equal frequency.)Even if the Colts’ rule came to be — and that’s a very unlikely prospect — the coaches wouldn’t necessarily catch on even though the math would be in their favor. Many coaches still kick field goals on fourth and goal from the 1, and that is generally a much worse mistake.But suppose for a second that the strategy did catch on. It would likely have a big ripple effect. Having a kicker who can convert from 50 yards consistently would become a lot more valuable. Also, knowing that teams could come back from nine points down on a single possession might make coaches play more aggressively in a number of different situations.The competition committee has already rejected the idea, meaning that it’s unlikely to be adopted any time soon. (It will still be offered up to the owners next week, but without the committee’s endorsement.) But that leaves room for my alternative: How about any time that a team converts a 2-pointer, it can either take the two points or take one point and try again? Then no lead would be safe.
LeBron James’s Cleveland Cavaliers might be trailing the Golden State Warriors 3-2 in the NBA Finals. The Cavs might, as their Vegas odds suggest, have a mere 12 percent chance of winning the NBA championship. But according to just about every statistical measurement available, the self-proclaimed “best player in the world” is having a series for the ages.Build a bare-bones performance metric that simply adds a player’s points, rebounds and assists and then divides by the number of games the team played,1Using team games penalizes players who missed games — you can’t add value if you don’t play. and James’s 2015 finals ranks as the best of the past 30 years.Get more complex — using, say, a points above replacement (PAR) estimator based on the single-game version of Daniel Myers’s Box Plus/Minus2Which takes into account the location and strength of opponent for each game. — and James ranks sixth among all NBA Finals participants since 1985.3Despite not ranking in the top 25 in our bare-bones metric (and so not making the chart above), Magic Johnson’s 1988 finals performance places second in PAR per team game.So at either pole of the complexity spectrum, James has been the top player of these finals. (Neil Greenberg of the Washington Post and ESPN Insider’s Kevin Pelton came to similar conclusions using a few more metrics of varying intricacy.) And from a historical perspective, output of this level usually leads to winning the NBA Finals and the NBA Finals MVP: Every player near James’s combined total of points, rebounds and assists ended up garnering MVP honors.In a vacuum, then, James’s performance has been so historically strong that it would be a shame for him not to win the award.But on the other hand, if the Warriors win the series and the MVP goes to James, it will be the first time that a member of the losing team has received the honor since 1969, when Jerry West of the Los Angeles Lakers won in spite of the Boston Celtics’ championship. And, as Pelton notes, the culture of denying MVP honors to a nonchampion has grown in the intervening years, across all sports.In the NBA alone, nine players since 1985 have been the best player in their series by PAR through five games yet failed to win the MVP after their teams lost. (To a certain extent, this also speaks to what can happen between Games 5 and 7 of a series between closely matched teams.) In 2011, Dwyane Wade — then James’s teammate on the Miami Heat — outplayed Dirk Nowitzki to a greater extent than James has outplayed presumptive Warriors MVP candidate Stephen Curry4Andre Iguodala actually leads Golden State in PAR during the series. thus far yet still lost the award to the Dallas Mavericks star. So as great as James has been, it might not be enough to justify the award if Cleveland loses the series.There’s one more angle to think about, though, when it comes to James’s 2015 finals performance. It may be that all our stats and metrics simply break down when forced to consider the unparalleled burden that James has been forced to carry on this undermanned, undertalented Cavaliers squad. James’s 41.1 percent usage rate in this series is the largest of any finalist since 1985, breaking Michael Jordan’s mark of 39.6 percent for the Chicago Bulls against the Phoenix Suns in 1993. James is also logging an incredible 45.6 minutes per game, the eighth-most of any qualified5Minimum 140 minutes played in the series. finalist since 1985.As Tom Haberstroh wrote over the weekend, James’s physical workload during these finals has been termed “unfathomable” (among other things) by sports science experts. At the limits of human endurance and on-court influence — through his shooting and passing, James was involved in 70 of Cleveland’s 91 points in Game 5 — there may be no numbers that can do justice to how irreplaceable James has been for the Cavaliers in this series.They don’t necessarily give out awards for being completely and utterly essential to your team, of course. And, as always, “value” is in the eye of the beholder. But whether the Cavs win or lose, it’s not hard to imagine this series going down as a testament to James’s singular talent, stamina and durability. And if that doesn’t constitute “value,” I’m not sure what does.
INDIANAPOLIS — The Ohio State men’s basketball team appears to be collecting championships. There’s only one left, and it’s the most elusive of them all. It’s so elusive, only one OSU men’s basketball team has won the NCAA Championship before: the 1960 team, led by coach Fred Taylor and the tournament’s Most Outstanding Player, Jerry Lucas. This year’s version enters the tournament as the No. 1 overall seed. It will go on to face the winner of a play-in game between Texas-San Antonio and Alabama State on Friday in Cleveland. Lucas said he believes this team has a shot at being the second OSU team to win an NCAA Championship. “I think they have a good shot at winning,” Lucas told The Lantern. “They’re strong inside; they have good shooters; they handle the ball well and have a good perimeter game. They’re strong in every facet of the game.” Lucas warned that the road to the finals isn’t an easy one. “They’ll be ready, but what is it, six games they’re going to have to win? It’s going to be tough. If they’re not shooting well and some other team gets hot it could cause them problems,” Lucas said. “But they have all the weapons they need.” Lucas wasn’t the only alumnus who said he has faith in this squad. J.J. Sullinger, another former Buckeye basketball player and older brother of freshman forward Jared Sullinger, also weighed in on this team’s chances. “We have so many weapons. People talk all the time about how we don’t have any depth. We absolutely have depth,” J.J. said. “We have confidence in every Buckeye that goes into the game. If we play defense and rebound well, nobody’s going to beat us.” J.J. had some advice for the younger guys, including Jared and freshman forward Deshaun Thomas, who have never played in the NCAA Tournament before. “It’s back to the drawing board. It’s a new season and a different kind of commitment,” J.J. said. “It’s win or go home. They’re celebrating right now, but once you step out of the shower it’s a brand new season.” For their part, even the young Buckeyes seem to understand what’s at stake, including being the No. 1 overall seed. “It’s something special,” Sullinger said. “At the same time we still have a lot of work to do so it doesn’t stop here. … You just have to take it one game at a time and focus on your opponent.” Coach Thad Matta said he considered it an honor given the parity in college basketball. “You look across the country at all the great teams, and I give our guys a lot of credit,” coach Thad Matta said. “They’ve come ready to play for 34 games, and probably the hardest thing I think we’ve found this year was the effort that the teams give to beat you each night.” In the locker room after the game, junior guard William Buford, like Matta, acknowledged that this team would have a bull’s-eye as the No. 1 overall seed. He also said it wouldn’t bother them. “It’s no pressure for us,” Buford said. “We’re just going to go out and play how we know how to play, and play Ohio State basketball.” The last time the Buckeyes earned a No. 1 seed was in 2007, when they advanced all the way to the finals before loosing to the eventual champion Florida Gators. Buford admitted his team has some weaknesses. “Our defense, we take too many possessions off on defense. I think we need to get our offensive execution together too,” Buford said. “We’re getting good shots; we just weren’t knocking them down (this weekend).” After the Big Ten Tournament was over, and everything was said and done, senior guard Jon Diebler put everything into perspective. “We’re happy we accomplished this,” Diebler said. “We’re going to enjoy it tonight and get right back to work.”
The Columbus Blue Jackets are again at the center of controversy, but this time it has nothing to do with an upset fan base. In Wednesday’s game against the Los Angeles Kings, with the score tied, 2-2, Blue Jackets center Samuel Påhlsson was sent to the penalty box for holding at 18:54 of the third period. As the game clock wound down it appeared the game would head into overtime. But with less than a second left, Kings’ defenseman Drew Doughty put a rebound past Blue Jackets goaltender Curtis Sanford just as time expired. The officiating crew reviewed the goal to confirm that it had been scored before time expired. The ruling on the ice that the play had resulted in a goal stood, and Doughty was credited with a game-winning power-play goal at 19:59 of the third period. The controversy did not arise until after the game when the Blue Jackets reviewed the goal for themselves. Members of the Blue Jackets staff noticed a malfunction with the game clock. According to the Blue Jackets, with 1.8 seconds left, the game clock appeared to freeze for a full second. Representatives from the Blue Jackets said they felt time should have expired before Doughty scored and the game should have gone in to overtime. Blue Jackets spokesman Todd Sharrock said the organization is “disappointed with what happened.” Sharrock said the Blue Jackets have brought the matter to the attention of National Hockey League officials. Blue Jackets general manager Scott Howson opined on the matter via his blog on the team’s website. “The official results of the NHL games played last night show that the Columbus Blue Jackets lost to the Los Angeles Kings 3-2 in regulation time in Los Angeles,” Howson said in his post. “However, this was an unjust result. In reality, this game should have gone to overtime, and we will never know what the true result of the game should have been.” The NHL acknowledged that they are looking in to the incident. “The league has begun a thorough review in to the matter,” said John Dellapina, NHL spokesman. Members of the Los Angeles Kings organization did not immediately respond to The Lantern’s request for comment. The loss is the Blue Jackets’ sixth in a row, and leaves the team with 32 points through 51 games. The Blue Jackets currently reside in last place in the NHL, and fifth place in the Central Division of the Western Conference. This incident is just one of many storylines in the past week for the organization. On Jan.28, NHL commissioner Gary Bettman announced in his annual All-Star address that the Blue Jackets organization was chosen as the host for the 2013 NHL All-Star Celebration. Later that day, fans gathered outside of Nationwide Arena to protest Blue Jackets’ management. Multiple reports have confirmed that Blue Jackets’ center Jeff Carter, acquired from the Philadelphia Flyers during the offseason, is on the trading block among rumors of his unhappiness with the organization.
Regardless of what inspired John Simon’s postgame outpouring, the typically stoic, tight-lipped senior captain and defensive lineman said he still has no idea where it came from. “I can’t tell you I’m planning speeches before the game or anything like that,” he said. “It came out and, you know, I just wanted to tell them how I felt.” Perhaps thanks to Simon’s rallying cry, a reason to battle through a season with almost nothing tangible to play for might have never been more apparent. The question, which has almost become rhetorical, of “what is this team playing for” finally might have been answered, but not because of anything that happened on the field that day. After surviving California, 35-28, first-year coach Urban Meyer said Simon “opened his soul” for everyone else to see. Simon, Meyer said, was close to not suiting up against the Golden Bears. “He had a sore shoulder. They kept telling me all week, it should be fine, it should be fine; it just didn’t heal as fast as we hoped,” he said. But Simon did play, and to the tune of one tackle and one sack. After junior safety Christian Bryant’s late interception helped the Buckeyes (3-0) squeak by Cal in the waning minutes of the fourth quarter, a near-gut wrenching loss for OSU seemed to be a gut-check win for the undefeated squad. Meyer said Simon lost it behind the closed doors of the team’s locker room inside Ohio Stadium. A typically corporate-like Meyer opted to share a moment with reporters that could’ve otherwise remained unknown to anyone outside of the confines in which it happened. “Can you put a jersey up there or something that says ‘John Simon?’” Meyer asked. “Because that’s a grown ass man, excuse my language.” While Meyer chose not to divulge the particulars of what Simon had to say, redshirt sophomore cornerback Bradley Roby said the defensive lineman revealed himself. “He just pretty much let us know that he probably wasn’t even supposed to play today but he played anyways just because he loves us,” Roby said. “So it was just that we saw the real him come out and it was a crazy moment.” Meyer said Simon’s speech was a long look in the mirror. “Are we doing enough for our team? That guy – what he just did in there … am I doing enough? When I say I – as our coaching staff – are we doing enough?” Meyer asked. “Are we doing as much as he’s doing?” Playing both the interviewer and interviewee, Meyer promptly answered his own question. “No,” Meyer said. “We’ve gotta do more. Gotta do more. (That’s) gotta get you fired up.” Roby said the Buckeyes don’t want to fail each other. “It’s like we don’t want to let our teammates down when it comes down to it,” he said. “That’s how football is. It’s a teammate type of game. It’s not just one player that makes a team. It’s everybody.” That realization of that camaraderie on Saturday not only moved Roby but might have been the catalyst for Simon’s speech. “I was excited, I was just so excited for that win,” Simon said. “That was a great win for us, guys just showing that they’ll fight to the end and handle the adversity. I think we’re a scrappy team.” But after scraping by a team that lost its season-opener at home to Nevada, the Buckeyes will almost undoubtedly face questions and doubts about the legitimacy of their No. 16-ranking in the latest Associated Press top 25 poll. Saturday’s game, though, might have answered at least one question amid the others it left unresolved. What’s driving the Buckeyes through a season that will inevitably end on Nov. 24 against the University of Michigan? It could be because they “love” each other. “We all, like, love each other, so we all play,” Roby said. That means even playing through potentially debilitating injuries. “I hurt my shoulder a little bit, I came out for a few plays, but I came back because, I mean, it’s all a brotherhood,” Roby said. “That’s how we all feel about each other.” That fellowship, Meyer said, is something he’d extend to his own flesh and blood. “If we have another child I want to name him Urban John Simon Meyer or something like that,” he said, before pausing to digest what he just said. “Can’t wait for that headline,” Meyer said playfully. “But that’s how much I love that guy. I’m not ashamed to say I love him. Love that guy. Man.”
Wyatt Crosher and Colin Gay discuss Ohio State men’s basketball’s loss to Michigan State and win against Northwestern, and how the team’s NCAA Tournament chances look heading toward the Big Ten Tournament. They also look at men’s hockey’s pair of losses to Minnesota and baseball’s hot 4-0 start. And Colin gets to talk about Texas for a moment. Of course.
Police investigating the hacking of Pippa Middleton’s iCloud account to get hold of her pictures have arrested two people and searched a house.A 36-year-old man and 34-year-old woman were arrested at 5.45am on 11 January on suspicion of conspiracy to commit fraud and possession of a false identity document with improper intent. It is then alleged that the hacker tried to sell thousands of images to a newspaper.A Met Police spokesman said: “The man and woman were taken into custody at a south London police station and have since been bailed to return to the police station on a date in mid-March.” A property in Wellingborough, Northamptonshire was searched.The arrests relate to an investigation which began last year after claims that the Duchess of Cambridge’s sister had her iCloud account hacked. Want the best of The Telegraph direct to your email and WhatsApp? Sign up to our free twice-daily Front Page newsletter and new audio briefings.
He added: “Saffie was simply a beautiful little girl in every aspect of the word.”She was loved by everyone and her warmth and kindness will be remembered fondly.”Saffie was quiet and unassuming with a creative flair. An eight-year-old girl who become separated from her mother and sister during the Manchester terror attack has been confirmed dead.Saffie-Rose Roussos died from her injuries after a terrorist committed the atrocity at a concert by American singer Ariana Grande on Monday night.The headteacher at her school, Chris Upton, said: “Saffie was simply a beautiful little girl in every aspect of the word. She was loved by everyone”. She is the second person to be confirmed dead, after it was confirmed Georgina Bethany Callander, 18, had died.Ms Callander had met Ariana Grande in 2015, and posted excitedly about the time she met the singer on Instagram.She attended Runshaw College in Lancashire. “In the panic she may have been taken to the Etihad stadium please look for her. “Mum and sister are ok just need to find Saffie please help please share don’t contact me please contact the police who can get to Lisa quicker.” In a statement released this afternoon, Tarleton Community Primary School headteacher, Chris Upton, said the news was “heartbreaking”.”News of Saffie’s death in this appalling attack has come as a tremendous shock to all of us and I would like to send our deepest condolences to all of her family and friends,” said Mr Upton.”The thought that anyone could go out to a concert and not come home is heartbreaking.” “We are a tight-knit school and wider community and will give each other the support that we need at this difficult time.” Saffie’s parents are believed to run a fish and chip shop in Leyland, Lancs.Saffie-Rose’s mother and sister, Lisa and her older sister Ashlee are being treated for shrapnel injuries in separate hospitals.Kate Tinsley, whose daughter Jessica was a friend of Saffie at Tarleton Community Primary School, near Preston, had earlier told The Sun: “Everybody is worried, the whole village. Everybody is in bits waiting for news, just some news that she’s okay, she’s alive.”Saffie-Rose was at the concert with her mother Lisa and her older sister Ashlee, who are both reportedly being treated in hospital. Want the best of The Telegraph direct to your email and WhatsApp? Sign up to our free twice-daily Front Page newsletter and new audio briefings. Hannah Melling wrote on Facebook: “My friend Lisa and her daughters Ashlee and Saffie were at the concert last night.“Saffie-Rose, 8 years old is still missing. Her mum Lisa and sister Ash are in hospital with shrapnel injuries which are not life threatening but Saffie is still missing. Ashlee’s in Bolton but Lisa is in a different one.“Please could you share this post and help find her…please contact me with ANY INFORMATION.”Diana Hopkins wrote: “Saffie Rose Roussos she’s 8 and still missing her sister Ash is being treated in Bolton her mum Lisa is also being treated for shrapnel wounds. Georgina Callander (left) pictured with Ariana GrandeCredit:Instagram Saffie Rose Roussos: ‘simply a beautiful little girl’Credit:PA “Our focus is now on helping pupils and staff cope with this shocking news and we have called in specialist support from Lancashire County Council to help us do that.
Gwynedd Council has been informed. Headteacher Carys Jones has been in touch with the RSPCA, RSPB, and pest control at Gwynedd Council in a bid to tackle the problem.But some parents are warning that someone could be seriously injured by the birds unless action is taken quickly.Dawn Jones, whose six and three-year-old children attend the school said numerous complaints have been made to the council about the aggressive behaviour of the birds.Mrs Jones said: “The children have not been allowed to go out to play at break times for fear of injury to them.” The mum-of-two said the problem with seagulls was far from being a one-off: “This is not an isolated incident but one the school suffered last year too but nothing was done then either. Today a seagull divebombed me and tore a chunk of sandwich out of my hand. It may be time to go home.— Moosetress (@mistresscurvy) 13 April 2017 A seagull just divebombed the dog…Dog went inside. Smart dog.— Paula (@psailoveu) 18 May 2017 “There are seagulls all around the school complex and at present they have chicks.”This has led to the adult seagulls becoming very aggressive towards anyone who walks around the school yard.”They are swooping low and aiming at peoples heads.”The adults are worried about dropping off and collecting their children and the children are becoming terrified to go to school. Even the staff have been attacked.”The head teacher has as always been fantastic with trying to resolve this situation and the staff are doing all they can.”Headteacher Mrs Jones insists that, with the help of Gwynedd Council, the issue will be resolved before the end of the week.Local councillor Nia Jeffreys says it is now important to prevent the seagulls from returning to the school to nest next year. Schoolchildren have been shut indoors during the hottest day of the year because of menacing seagulls.Ysgol Eifion Wyn in Porthmadog, Wales has been forced to keep children off the playground during break-time at least twice this week as herring gulls have been swooping around the heads of parents, teachers and kids.The divebombing seagulls have left the school in “lockdown”, in fear of their sharp beaks.The situation is so dire that some parents have reported being “too scared” to pick up their children.Seagulls nest on the roof of the school, and swoop down on anyone who dares venture outside.It is believed their aggressive behaviour is aimed at protecting their chicks. I just witnessed a woman get an ice cream, to then get attacked by a seagull, which then went on to steal the ice cream and leave the cone.😳— Gemma McKeon (@jomagem) 16 June 2017 This has happened twice this week when temperatures have reached 30C, she added. Want the best of The Telegraph direct to your email and WhatsApp? Sign up to our free twice-daily Front Page newsletter and new audio briefings.
Want the best of The Telegraph direct to your email and WhatsApp? Sign up to our free twice-daily Front Page newsletter and new audio briefings. Beauty shot and aerials over Windsor Castle ahead of the royal wedding on Saturday.
He said of Ms Markle in a video recorded outside Buckingham Palace: “She is loud, she is American, she fights for her cause. We don’t do that here.“We do things quietly with dignity.“Ms Markle is going to be a little bit challenged when it comes to that because she’s so used to doing things the American way, which is not the British way.” Want the best of The Telegraph direct to your email and WhatsApp? Sign up to our free twice-daily Front Page newsletter and new audio briefings. Wow! Read what Zeitblatt had to say about me and my converage of the Royal Weddging a week ago today! Congratulations to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. @toryshulman @SchaumburgLippe @chrisshipitv @Caliativity @ThePerezHilton @reallorraine @BMSF_UK https://t.co/XSZBHuR2BV— Thomas J. Mace-Archer-Mills (@ThomasJMMADM) May 26, 2018 However, he later responded to the claims in the WSJ, saying: “The Wall Street Journal breached journalistic trust, omitted truths and mis-sold what the initial interview was for,” he said.”Many of the facts in the article are inaccurate and the Wall Street Journal itself was given many opportunities to ensure that the article was published with the most accurate information available. The WSJ chose not to adhere to the facts or their integrity.” Thomas Muscatello Those watching the royal wedding on foreign channels may not have been surprised to see a ‘royal expert’ with a plummy voice and a triple-barreled name explaining the festivities to viewers.However, a man who calls himself Thomas J Mace-Archer-Mills Esq was reportedly not all he seemed.Mr “Mace-Archer-Mills” has built himself a relatively large media platform over the past few years, touting himself as an expert on the British royals, speaking in an English accent – but, according to US media reports, he is a New Yorker named Thomas “Tommy” Muscatello.Mr Muscatello appeared on multiple foreign networks over the weekend, wearing tweed and a bow tie, pronouncing his opinions on Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. Producers seemingly thought they were commissioning a bona fide upper-crust British man.His website lists scores of broadcasters who have enlisted his views on royal matters including many BBC radio stations, as well as many from around the globe. The “royal expert” was so widely-interviewed that one piece described him as “the most interviewed man” on the subject of the royal wedding. He retweeted this message to his followers.The Wall Street Journal reported the alleged true background of the 38-year-old Italian-American, who told the newspaper that he identifies more as British than American, and that he had been obsessed with the UK as a child.He said he made his surname using the “names of friends and distant relations” and that he has an agreement with two unrelated elderly British people who let him call them his grandparents. The Telegraph has contacted Mr Muscatello for comment.The WSJ said in a statement: “We stand by our reporting.” He told a US channel from a five-star hotel that the Duchess of Sussex should not upstage existing members of the royal family “especially when you’re coming in the way you are”.The royal enthusiast also told a Norwegian broadcaster that the marriage should be about “keeping integrity, keeping formality and making sure that the traditions and heritage that we have as British people remain at the forefront”.
A new mother has broken the world record for Britain’s toughest race just months after giving birth, training right up until the day she had her daughter.Champion runner Jasmin Paris knocked a staggering 12 hours off the record for the Spine Race ultra-marathon, previously held by athlete Eoin Keith. She became the first woman to win the race, which was first held in 2012.Ms Paris, originally from Derbyshire, won the race and smashed the record despite having to stop at every checkpoint to express milk for her 14-month-old daughter, Rowan, who recently recovered from two back-to-back viral infections.She finished the 268-mile route along the full Pennine Way in 83 hours, 12 minutes and 23 seconds, starting on Sunday morning and finishing on Wednesday night.–– ADVERTISEMENT ––The race is frequently called “Britain’s most brutal” and extends from Derbyshire’s Peak District to the Scottish Borders. Conditions were gruelling, with 50-mile-per-hour winds and driving rain along the route, which contains almost two Mount Everest’s worth of elevation.Under half of the starters generally finish the race, with only 45 per cent of runners crossing the finish line last year. The athlete showed immense focus, sleeping for just a handful of hours during the race. Her total rest time, including eating, sleeping, dealing with kit and expressing milk, was just over seven hours.She juggled running more than 30 miles a week with writing a thesis, working as a vet and being a first-time parent. It was her first time tackling the Spine Race, but she has form for beating world records; having broken the female world record for the Bob Graham Round, a loop taking in 42 Lake District peaks, as well as the record for the Ramsay Round, a 58-mile circuit of 24 Scottish mountains.It is not unheard-of for women to win races and beat records shortly after giving birth; in 2007, Paula Radcliffe won the 2007 New York City Marathon less than a year after giving birth to her daughter, and during the 2011 Boston Marathon, two-time Olympian Kara Goucher recorded her personal best time at the distance just seven months after her son was born. The runners faced high winds and rainCredit:Mick Kenyon/Montane Spine She said: “Training became a juggling act with baby time, training frequently taking second place, or losing out altogether. To reconcile the two, I started to train from 5-6.30am before work, whilst my little family were cosy warm in bed, but it wasn’t easy, especially after a night of broken sleep (our offspring is not of the ‘sleep through the night’ variety).“Looking back at the end of the season I was slightly surprised, but extremely happy with what I had achieved (British Champion, and being competitive again at a world level in Skyracing at Glencoe Skyline in September).“However, maybe as a consequence of contentment, my motivation to train took a definite nose-dive. I found it harder and harder to leave my bed for the cold darkness outside, and realised that I needed a new focus. So I did something crazy, and entered a race I’d vowed I would never ever run, the Spine.”On Tuesday the runner said she was “really enjoying” herself, and crossed the finish line just after 7pm on Wednesday with a huge grin on her face. Want the best of The Telegraph direct to your email and WhatsApp? Sign up to our free twice-daily Front Page newsletter and new audio briefings. Great to be racing again. Never had such a good incentive to get to the finish… pic.twitter.com/IrjfzTlTXk— Jasmin Paris (@JasminKParis) April 14, 2018 A spokesperson for the Spine Race told The Telegraph: “Jasmin ran the entire course. Her preparation before the course and admin during the race was impeccable. She is fast and she’s an elite athlete.” The 35-year-old small animal vet has written on her blog of the difficulties of training while having a newborn, and said she entered the race she “vowed [she] would never run” in order to get back into running.
Fiona Bruce’s Antiques Roadshow salary is hidden, although her Question Time fees will be publishedCredit:Anna Gordon/BBC “We recommend that the corporation re-think this decision ahead of its forthcoming Annual Report.”The BBC is now under pressure from Government to publish their pay.A DCMS spokesman said: “BBC Studios is a wholly commercial company not funded by the licence fee and needs to be able to compete on a level playing field to succeed. However, we expect BBC Studios to lead industry best practice on pay transparency and would encourage the BBC to consider if there is more it can do on this front.”The corporation made the disclosure to the select committee, which demanded written answers about BBC pay after finding responses before a Westminster hearing last year to be unsatisfactory. The claim drew a withering response from the select committee, which said: “The BBC, as a publicly funded body, has a responsibility to lead on issues of pay and transparency. The BBC chooses to call its independent production arm ‘BBC Studios’ because of the strength of the BBC’s reputation, and we find the suggestion extraordinary – from the perspective of licence fee payers – that the BBC does not have information from BBC Studios as to the level of remuneration it pays to talent. Want the best of The Telegraph direct to your email and WhatsApp? Sign up to our free twice-daily Front Page newsletter and new audio briefings. Fiona Bruce’s salary for Fake or Fortune? and Antiques Roadshow is secret because those shows are made by BBC Studios, although her Question Time fee will be disclosed later this year as that contract is directly with the BBC.The BBC said that it “of course has this data for BBC Studios”, available to a handful of executives, but will not publish it.The select committee also criticised the BBC for failing to acknowledge that it has a pay discrimination problem.“Our evidence suggests women with the BBC are working in comparable jobs to men but earning far less. This is unacceptable: the BBC is failing to live up to its duty to advance equality of opportunity,” it said. The BBC has claimed it has no idea what many of its top stars are paid, a situation that MPs have described as “extraordinary”.A large proportion of BBC shows are made by independent production companies, which do not have to reveal salaries. And under changes introduced last year, presenters and actors working for the corporation’s commercial arm, BBC Studios, can also keep pay details secret.BBC Studios stars include Strictly Come Dancing’s Tess Daly and Claudia Winkleman, Alex Jones and Matt Baker of The One Show, along with the casts of EastEnders, Casualty and Doctor Who.In a written submission to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport select committee, published on Wednesday, the BBC said: “The Government agreed that BBC Studios should be treated on a level playing field with independent production companies. In order for the BBC to compete in an increasingly global market for talent we continue to believe this is essential.“The BBC does not have information about payments made to talent by independent production companies. When we commission a programme from an independent production company, we negotiate a price for the programme – individual contractual arrangements with talent are a matter for them.”
A baby was spotted in the Royal parks for the first time in more than a decade Experts suggested a 30pc decline in tawny numbers was being caused by light pollution and urbanisation Credit:Paula Redmond Tawny owls are stocky, medium-sized birds, equivalent in shape to the common woodpigeon, which are usually seen in woodland as well as urban parks and suburban gardens.Their trademark “twit-twoo” is a combination of the female call, described as a “kewick” sound, and the male’s response, a long and wavering hoot. Royal Parks officials suspect sightings of the nocturnal birds will become more commonplace with callings heard more frequently over the past 18 months.Paul Stancliffe, from the British Trust for Ornithology, said: “It is great to hear that Tawny Owls are once again breeding in The Royal Parks after an absence of more than a decade. “Hopefully, when we crunch the numbers from this winter’s Tawny Owl survey we will see this reflected elsewhere in the country, and a welcome upturn in this beautiful owl’s fortunes.” “We don’t know if there are more youngsters or where they’ve bred but it may well be that our longer grass areas and meadows are encouraging them by providing habitat for small mammals as food source,” he added. Tawny owls are making a comeback, wildlife experts hope after a baby was spotted in the Royal parks for the first time in more than a decade. The last official survey carried out in 2005 estimated there were around 50,000 tawny owls across Britain but experts said evidence suggested numbers had fallen by 30 per cent.Concern peaked last September when the British Trust for Ornithology (BTO) took the step of issuing an appeal for people to dedicate 20 minutes a week to listen out for the owl’s “twit-twoo” call.The unusual move came amid growing fears the hoot could be lost for good with light pollution and urbanisation credited as driving the demise.However, the species is now said to be flourishing across London’s Royal Parks. On Tuesday, gardeners found a baby owl perched on a tractor in St James’s Park, marking the first discovery of its kind in the grounds in 12 years. Mark Wasilewski, St James’s Park Manager, said: “Our gardeners were delighted to discover a baby tawny owl sat on their tractor, right in the centre of London. “The last time we were aware of any breeding of these birds in St James’s Park was about 12 years ago when we observed four youngsters perched on a branch, although we don’t know where they bred.” The conservation status of the tawny owl changed from green to amber last yearCredit:Paula Redmond Want the best of The Telegraph direct to your email and WhatsApp? Sign up to our free twice-daily Front Page newsletter and new audio briefings. The conservation status of the tawny owl changed from green to amber last year, signalling a growing concern for the species.The Tawny Owl Calling Survey, which is running again this year until 31 March, is hoped to help researchers locate where the birds are and to pinpoint the areas where the species was missing. An RSPB Spokesperson said:“It’s brilliant to hear that tawny owls are breeding again in St. James’s Park. It just goes to show how important our urban green spaces are for both wildlife and people.” The baby tawny owl we found in St James’s Park earlier this week enjoying some winter sun. We’ve since seen two adults and two youngsters, fantastic news! pic.twitter.com/sxIPL2x9zf— Royal Parks (@theroyalparks) February 28, 2019
Commuters with flexible working hours are shunning rail season tickets, new figures reveal, as industry experts call for a “radical overhaul” in fares.Journeys using season tickets recorded a fall for the third year in a row, plummeting from 702 million in 2014/15 to 625 million in 2018/19, according to quarterly statistics from the Office of Road and Rail.Meanwhile the use of regular tickets has increased by five per cent and the overall number of train trips has increased by 50.9 million, taking this year’s total to a record high of 1.76 billion.Experts partly blame the trend on an increase in part-time and flexible working, meaning travellers are unable to take full advantage of all the journeys afforded by season tickets so instead opt to pay as they go.Anthony Smith, chief executive of the independent watchdog Transport Focus, said: “This increase in the number of train journeys is good news. However, significant, sustained, longer-term investment in the railway must continue in order to build on this, reduce overcrowding and help regain passenger trust.“The continued decline in season tickets underlines the need for a radical overhaul of the fares structure. Passengers want a fares system that is simple to use, easy to understand and better value for money.“Rail fares and ticketing needs to suit the way we travel now – there is a huge demand for smarter ticketing which can help flexible and part-time workers better access the railway.”Rail Delivery Group, which represents the rail industry, said companies are not taking into account “how people live and work today”, while Campaign for Better Transport highlight that “the way people travel is changing”.Paul Plummer, chief executive of the Rail Delivery Group, said: “Rail companies are changing and improving today, running thousands of extra services every week so that more people can benefit from taking the train and our communities are better connected.”The long-term decline in season tickets, despite the continued growth in commuting, shows that the rail fares system needs to change to match how people live and work today.”This is why we want to work with Government on proposals to update regulation that would support flexible working.” Show more Darren Shirley, chief executive of Campaign for Better Transport, said: “Journeys on the railway are at a record high, showing rail’s relevance to communities is growing. But these figures hide important challenges.”There is a huge regional divide with London and the South East accounting for 70 per cent of all trips. Meanwhile, season ticket sales continue to fall showing the way people travel is changing.”The Government’s rail review must ensure that the economic, social and environmental benefits of rail are felt across the whole country while ticketing reform must ensure there are cheaper, simpler, fairer fares relevant to modern needs.” Want the best of The Telegraph direct to your email and WhatsApp? Sign up to our free twice-daily Front Page newsletter and new audio briefings.